Noah's Ark has been a vessel of ridicule for quite some time. One popular caricature is the impossibility of Noah taking two of every species aboard the Ark. This entire issue is laid to rest by simply reading the text.
First of all, only the land animals were taken on the Ark. That solves most of the problems because much of the animal kingdom lives in the water. Besides, though many marine animals were buried in the Flood waters, a large number would have been able to survive and procreate, thus they would have not needed the Ark.
Second of all, the Bible doesn't use the word species; rather, it uses kind. To understand what that is, we have to go back to Genesis 1. God created the kinds to multiply after themselves. This implies a set order that then produces many variations from those original created kinds. Created kinds would then best be understood at the genus or even family levels (ie dog/wolf kind, etc.).
As for dinosaurs, most were quite small, and Noah probably took juvenile representatives for the larger ones, which ensures longer procreation. However, because the climate was different after the Flood, their ability to multiply and adapt was likely limited. Those that did survive for a time were probably hunted into extinction, while the rest died off because of the climate, disease, etc.
The real problem is not the Ark; it is rather a biased worldview that is exposed by the text itself. Man hates God and can only develop straw men, which only magnifies the holes in his arguments against the Bible.
No comments:
Post a Comment